83.6% treated within 62 days · standard 85% · About this data
Diagnostics
Below NHS standard
10.6% waiting 6+ weeks · standard 1.0% or fewer · About this data
Mortality (SHMI)
As expected
Screening indicator, not a death rate — a prompt to investigate, not proof of poor care · About this data
In plain English
AI-generated
Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust reported 24,583 A&E attendances in July 2026, with 72.4% of patients treated within four hours. In June 2026, the trust had 55,547 patients on its waiting list, and 65.5% were seen within 18 weeks of referral. Staff survey data from 2025 showed that 50.3% of employees would recommend the trust to friends or relatives.
Automatically generated from the official figures on this page and checked to restate only those figures. Last generated 19 August 2026. This is a plain-English summary, not medical advice. About these summaries
CQC inspection ratings
Safe
Requires improvement
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Requires improvement
Well-led
Good
The Care Quality Commission rates hospitals on five questions. This location was last inspected April 2022. Source: CQC. About CQC ratings
CQC ratings by service
CQC rated these services individually — there is no single overall rating for this location.
Critical careGood
Safe
Good
Effective
Good
Caring
Outstanding
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Good
rated December 2018
End of life careGood
Safe
Good
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Requires improvement
Well-led
Good
rated October 2017
MaternityGood
Safe
Requires improvement
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Good
rated November 2022
Medical care (including older people's care)Requires improvement
▲ 244 vs yr agoBetter than 44% of trustsData: Jul 2026
NHS England publishes waiting-time and A&E figures per trust, not per building — figures marked Trust-wide cover all hospitals run by Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust.
Performance over time
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · hover a month for the exact figure · monthly data table
Total waiting list
Incomplete pathways, all specialties
Waiting under 18 weeks
Share of the waiting list
A&E seen within 4 hours
All department types
A&E performance
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · Latest month: July 2026· all A&E department types combined — the official headline basis.
A&E attendances
24,583
All department types · latest month
Seen within 4 hours
72.4%
All department types · NHS standard: 95%
Waited over 12 hours
255
From decision-to-admit ('trolley waits')
Emergency admissions
4,396
All department types · latest month
Major A&E only (Type 1)
Attendances
17,483
Seen within 4 hours
62.6%
The all-types headline above includes minor-injury units and urgent treatment centres (Type 3), which typically report much higher 4-hour performance and lift the combined figure. This narrower figure covers only the main, consultant-led A&E department run by Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust— Type 1 in NHS England's classification.
Department type
Attendances
Within 4 hours
All types (official headline)
24,583
72.4%
Type 1 — major A&E
17,483
62.6%
Type 2 — single-specialty A&E
127
100.0%
Type 3 — minor injury / UTC
6,973
96.6%
Source: NHS England A&E Attendances & Emergency Admissions. About this data
Source: NHS England Cancer Waiting Times. The 62-day standard is urgent referral to first treatment; the 28-day faster-diagnosis standard is referral to diagnosis or ruling-out. About this data
Patient experience (Friends & Family Test)
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · Latest month: June 2026· a voluntary, monthly feedback survey — the figure is the share of respondents who rated their experience 'good' or 'very good'. Response rates are often low and respondents are self-selected, not a representative sample, so read this alongside the clinical measures above, not on its own.
2025 · the views of staff who work at this trust — a measure of workforce culture, morale and confidence, not a direct measure of clinical outcomes. There is no official NHS target for these figures, so they are shown as context, never a pass or fail.
Staff happy for a friend or relative to be treated here
50.3%
Agreed · 2025 NHS Staff Survey▼ 1.4 pts vs 2024Median English trust: 63.9%
Staff engagement
6.52
out of 10 · 2025
Would recommend as a place to work
52.1%
Agreed · 2025
The NHS Staff Survey records the views of staff who chose to respond — a measure of workforce culture, morale and staff confidence, not a direct measure of clinical outcomes or safety. Response rates vary between trusts. England only; Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland run separate staff surveys on a different basis, so these figures are never compared across nations.
Source: NHS Staff Survey (NHS England), Open Government Licence. About this data
Cancelled operations
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · Quarter ending 30 June 2026· last-minute cancellations for NON-CLINICAL reasons (no bed, no staff, an emergency taking priority) — not cancellations chosen by the patient or on clinical grounds. It's a raw count, so larger trusts naturally cancel more in absolute terms — read this alongside the other measures above, not on its own.
Last-minute cancellations
153
elective ops cancelled on the day, non-clinical reasons
Not rebooked within 28 days
2
the NHS standard is a new date within 28 days
% not rebooked in time
1.3%
share of cancelled ops without a new date inside 28 days
Bed occupancy, ambulance handovers & delayed discharges (UEC Daily SitRep)
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · Snapshot at 8am, 29 March 2026. This is unvalidated management information— NHS England's own label — and can be revised for up to 14 days after first publication. It is collected only during the winter Daily SitRep window, so this is the latest date the collection has published, not necessarily today. It measures operational pressure (how full the hospital is), NOT care quality — high occupancy is normal for NHS hospitals, especially in winter, and is not a safety or performance score. The ambulance-handover figures below cover winter 2025-26 as a period total(not a snapshot): the time from an ambulance arriving to the patient being handed over to A&E staff. The delayed-discharge figures cover the most recent 7 daysof the collection (not a snapshot, and not the whole winter): a patient who "no longer meets the criteria to reside" is medically ready to leave hospital, but how quickly they actually do mostly reflects social-care and community capacity to receive them — NOT the hospital's own clinical quality. A higher handover or delayed-discharge figure means more operational pressure — like the rest of this section, none of it is a measure of care quality, and it carries no colour grading, badge or ranking.
Adult general & acute bed occupancy
95.6%
948 occupied of 992 open
Adult critical care occupancy
72.2%
13 occupied of 18 open
Ambulance handovers over 30 minutes
25.7%
of 18,431 handovers, winter 2025-26
Ambulance handovers over 60 minutes
1.2%
of 18,431 handovers, winter 2025-26
Medically fit but not discharged
180
patients/day who no longer met the criteria to reside but stayed in hospital, week to 29 March 2026
Discharged when fit
38%
of 2,041 who no longer met the criteria to reside, week to 29 March 2026
Source: NHS England UEC Daily SitRep, Ambulance Handover and Acute Discharge SitRep collections. About this data
Never Events (patient safety)
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · Financial year 2025/26 · Never Events are rare, serious, wholly-preventable incidents. This is a RAW count for 2025/26— it is NOT adjusted for how much surgery the trust does, and NHS England publishes it to prompt learning, NOT to compare trusts. A higher number is a prompt to look at the trust's own review, not proof it is less safe than a trust with fewer.
Never Events reported
1
Occurring in FY 2025/26 · not a comparative safety score
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · CQC National Maternity Survey, 2025 · scores are relative comparisons against other trusts, not a measure of absolute quality — based on 112 voluntary respondents (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). A lower score is a prompt to look closer, not proof of poor care.
Response rate
28.4%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
112
Of 395 sampled
Confidence & trust in staff (antenatal care)
8.1/10
About the same as most trusts
Kindness & compassion (labour & birth)
8.9/10
About the same as most trusts
Involved in decisions about care (labour & birth)
8.5/10
About the same as most trusts
Got help from staff when needed (in hospital, after the birth)
6.2/10
Worse than most trusts
Confidence & trust in your midwife (postnatal care at home)
7.4/10
Worse than most trusts
Midwife listened to you (postnatal care at home)
7.9/10
Worse than most trusts
Source: Care Quality Commission — National Maternity Survey. About this data
Stroke care (SSNAP audit)
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, latest quarter to 2026· the SSNAP level (A best .. E) is the audit's own published grade for the quality of this team's acute stroke-care PROCESSES, adjusted for case-mix, case ascertainment and audit compliance — it is not a guarantee of any individual patient's outcome. England only; SSNAP also covers Wales and Northern Ireland.
Pinderfields Hospital
D49.9/100
West Yorkshire and Harrogate
Domain grades (patient-centred)
Hyperacute assessmentD
Specialist pathwayB
ReperfusionE
MDT assessmentC
Therapy intensityC
Therapy frequencyD
Standards by dischargeD
Case ascertainment AAudit compliance B
Source: Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (Royal College of Physicians). About this data
Hip fracture care (NHFD audit)
National Hip Fracture Database, 2023audit year · "Met best-practice criteria" is the audit's own composite measure of this hospital's hip-fracture care PROCESSES — how quickly patients had surgery, were assessed and mobilised — not a guarantee of any individual patient's outcome. The 30-day mortality figure is case-mix adjusted; small numbers vary year to year. England only.
Met best-practice criteria
66.7%
The audit's own composite hip-fracture care measure
Prompt surgery (day of/after admission)
69.3%
Mobilised by day after surgery
74.2%
Orthogeriatric/medical assessment
95.0%
Falls assessment
99.7%
Bone-health assessment
99.1%
Acute length of stay
15.4 days
Hip fractures treated
580
This audit year — context, not a quality score
30-day mortality (case-mix adjusted)
5.2%
Lower is better · adjusted for patient factors, not a personal risk
Source: National Hip Fracture Database (Royal College of Physicians). About this data
Patient experience — inpatient care
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · CQC Adult Inpatient Survey, 2024 · scores are 0-10, and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the CQC 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 392 voluntary respondents (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.
Response rate
34.3%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
392
Of 1,250 sampled
Quality of information while waiting to be admitted
6.5/10
National average: 7.6/10
Worse than the national average
Cleanliness of your room or ward
8.8/10
National average: 8.9/10
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the doctors
8.6/10
National average: 9.0/10
Worse than the national average
Confidence and trust in the nurses
8.7/10
National average: 8.9/10
About the same as the national average
Enough nurses on duty
6.3/10
National average: 7.6/10
Worse than the national average
Involved in decisions about your care and treatment
6.7/10
National average: 7.2/10
Worse than the national average
Given enough privacy when examined or treated
9.1/10
National average: 9.4/10
Worse than the national average
Given enough notice about when you would leave hospital
6.3/10
National average: 6.9/10
Worse than the national average
Knew what would happen next with your care, before leaving hospital
6.2/10
National average: 6.7/10
About the same as the national average
Source: Care Quality Commission — CQC Adult Inpatient Survey. About this data
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · CQC Urgent & Emergency Care Survey (A&E), 2024 · scores are 0-10, and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the CQC 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 237 voluntary respondents who attended a major (type 1) A&E department (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.
Response rate
25.6%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
237
Of 950 sampled
Overall experience of A&E
7.0/10
National average: 7.3/10
About the same as the national average
Told how long you'd wait to be examined
3.4/10
National average: 2.6/10
About the same as the national average
Kept updated on your waiting time
3.8/10
National average: 3.4/10
About the same as the national average
Doctors and nurses listened to you
8.1/10
National average: 8.3/10
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the doctors and nurses
8.2/10
National average: 8.1/10
About the same as the national average
Involved in decisions about your care
7.2/10
National average: 7.4/10
About the same as the national average
Test results explained before you left
7.7/10
National average: 7.5/10
About the same as the national average
Felt safe around other patients
7.8/10
National average: 7.8/10
About the same as the national average
Told how to care for your condition at home after leaving
6.8/10
National average: 6.8/10
About the same as the national average
Treated with respect and dignity
8.2/10
National average: 8.3/10
About the same as the national average
Source: Care Quality Commission — CQC Urgent & Emergency Care Survey (A&E). About this data
Patient experience — cancer care
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · National Cancer Patient Experience Survey, 2025 · scores are the % of patients giving the most positive answer (and an overall 0–10 rating), and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the survey's 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 449 patients treated for cancer by this trust (a question is only shown here where at least 10 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.
Response rate
—
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
449
Who took part
Overall rating of care
8.9/10
National average: 8.9/10
About the same as the national average
Cancer diagnosis explained understandably
72%
National average: 78%
Worse than the national average
Easy to contact your main contact person
80%
National average: 84%
About the same as the national average
Involved as much as wanted in treatment decisions
77%
National average: 80%
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the team during hospital care
79%
National average: 78%
About the same as the national average
Always treated with respect and dignity in hospital
86%
National average: 88%
About the same as the national average
Possible side effects explained understandably
75%
National average: 74%
About the same as the national average
Given enough information about signs of cancer returning or spreading
66%
National average: 65%
About the same as the national average
The whole care team worked well together
91%
National average: 89%
About the same as the national average
Got the support needed from your GP practice since diagnosis
42%
National average: 45%
About the same as the national average
Source: NHS England (survey run by Picker on its behalf) — National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. About this data
Hip & knee replacement — patient outcomes (PROMs)
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · Financial year 2024-25(finalised) · patients having a primary hip or knee replacement voluntarily score their health before and after surgery. The average gain shown is adjusted for differences between patients (case-mix) — it is not a raw before/after difference and not a ranking, so read it alongside the patient numbers.
Hip replacement
Average health gain (adjusted)
21.3
Oxford Score, case-mix-adjusted, 0-48 scale Raw gain (unadjusted): 22.1
Patients
189
Modelled records — completed the questionnaire before & after
% who improved
93.7%
Oxford Score higher after surgery than before
EQ-5D Index gain (adjusted)
0.43
General health, secondary measure, 0-1 scale
Knee replacement
Average health gain (adjusted)
17.0
Oxford Score, case-mix-adjusted, 0-48 scale Raw gain (unadjusted): 17.4
Patients
285
Modelled records — completed the questionnaire before & after
% who improved
93.3%
Oxford Score higher after surgery than before
EQ-5D Index gain (adjusted)
0.31
General health, secondary measure, 0-1 scale
Source: NHS England PROMs (hip & knee replacement). About this data
Diagnostic test waits
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · Latest month: June 2026. The operational standard is that under 1% should wait more than 6 weeks.
Waiting 6+ weeks for a test
10.6%
of 13,401 patients on the diagnostic waiting list
Test
Waiting list
6+ weeks
6+ weeks (count)
13+ weeks
Urodynamics
104
46.2%
48
10
MRI
4,387
30.5%
1,340
185
Cystoscopy
165
7.9%
13
2
Audiology
479
2.1%
10
0
Ultrasound
3,563
0.2%
6
0
CT scan
975
0.1%
1
0
Flexi Sigmoidoscopy
162
0.0%
0
0
Gastroscopy
479
0.0%
0
0
DEXA Scan
471
0.0%
0
0
Cardiology
1,108
0.0%
0
0
Neurophysiology
565
0.0%
0
0
Respiratory physiology
390
0.0%
0
0
Colonoscopy
553
0.0%
0
0
Waiting 6+ weeks for a diagnostic test
All tests combined
Source: NHS England Diagnostic Waiting Times & Activity (DM01). About this data
Safety: infections
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · Cases in the 12 months to July 2026. Hospital-onset cases are those most likely acquired in hospital.
Infection
Cases (12 mo)
Hospital-onset
MRSA bacteraemia
5
3
C. difficile
120
59
E. coli bacteraemia
419
81
MSSA bacteraemia
136
51
Klebsiella bacteraemia
126
31
Pseudomonas bacteraemia
39
19
Hospital-onset cases per month
All infections combined
Source: UK Health Security Agency mandatory surveillance. About this data
Mortality (SHMI)
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · 12 months to Mar 2026.
As expected
1.10
SHMI value (1.00 = as many deaths as expected) · 2,825 deaths vs 2,575 expected
SHMI over time
Rolling 12-month value
The SHMI compares the number of deaths after hospital care with the number expected given patients' characteristics. It is not a death rate and a higher value is a prompt to investigate, not proof of poor care. Source: NHS England. About this data
Waiting times by specialty
Trust-wide (Mid Yorkshire Teaching NHS Trust) · Data: June 2026 · Source: NHS England Referral to Treatment statistics
Every figure on this page comes from an official publication: NHS England Referral to Treatment statistics, NHS England A&E statistics, and the Care Quality Commission directory. Data periods are shown against each figure — NHS England publishes with a lag of around six weeks. Read the full methodology.