Contains public sector information from the Care Quality Commission, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Corbett Hospital is run by The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust. Across The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, 63.0% of the waiting list had been waiting 18 weeks or less in August 2026, against the NHS standard of 92%.
At a glance
Whether this trust meets each official NHS operational standard — not a combined score or ranking.
73.4% treated within 62 days · standard 85% · About this data
Diagnostics
Below NHS standard
19.7% waiting 6+ weeks · standard 1.0% or fewer · About this data
Mortality (SHMI)
As expected
Screening indicator, not a death rate — a prompt to investigate, not proof of poor care · About this data
In plain English
AI-generated
The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust reported 14,685 A&E attendances in September 2026, with 79.7% of patients treated within four hours. In August 2026, the total waiting list stood at 48,882 patients, and 63% were seen within 18 weeks of referral. Staff survey data from 2025 showed that 54.6% of employees would recommend the trust to friends or relatives.
Automatically generated from the official figures on this page and checked to restate only those figures. Last generated 9 October 2026. This is a plain-English summary, not medical advice. About these summaries
CQC inspection ratings
Safe
Inadequate
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Inadequate
The Care Quality Commission rates hospitals on five questions. This location was last inspected January 2019. Source: CQC. About CQC ratings
CQC ratings by service
CQC rates these services individually. Each row is the most recent rating CQC published under that service name, with its date.
▲ 20 vs yr agoBetter than 59% of trustsData: Sep 2026
NHS England publishes waiting-time and A&E figures per trust, not per building — figures marked Trust-wide cover all hospitals run by The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust.
Performance over time
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · hover a month for the exact figure · monthly data table
Total waiting list
Incomplete pathways, all specialties
Waiting under 18 weeks
Share of the waiting list
A&E seen within 4 hours
All department types
A&E performance
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · Latest month: September 2026 · all A&E department types combined — the official headline basis.
A&E attendances
14,685
All department types · latest month
Seen within 4 hours
79.7%
All department types · NHS standard: 95%
Waited over 12 hours
155
From decision-to-admit ('trolley waits')
Emergency admissions
6,058
All department types · latest month
Major A&E only (Type 1)
Attendances
10,834
Seen within 4 hours
73.3%
The all-types headline above includes minor-injury units and urgent treatment centres (Type 3), which typically report much higher 4-hour performance and lift the combined figure. This narrower figure covers only the main, consultant-led A&E department run by The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust — Type 1 in NHS England's classification.
Department type
Attendances
Within 4 hours
All types (official headline)
14,685
79.7%
Type 1 — major A&E
10,834
73.3%
Type 3 — minor injury / UTC
3,851
97.6%
Source: NHS England A&E Attendances & Emergency Admissions. About this data
Cancer waiting times
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · Latest month: August 2026.
Faster diagnosis (28 days)
78.0%
1,226 of 1,571 treated in time
Target 75% · meets target
Treatment within 62 days
73.4%
124 of 169 treated in time
Target 85% · below target
Treatment within 31 days
94.2%
228 of 242 treated in time
Target 96% · below target
Treated within 62 days
Urgent referral to first treatment
Faster diagnosis (28 days)
Referral to diagnosis or ruling-out
Treated within 31 days
Decision to treat to first treatment
Source: NHS England Cancer Waiting Times. The 62-day standard is urgent referral to first treatment; the 28-day faster-diagnosis standard is referral to diagnosis or ruling-out. About this data
Patient experience (Friends & Family Test)
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · Latest month: August 2026 · a voluntary, monthly feedback survey — the figure is the share of respondents who rated their experience 'good' or 'very good'. Response rates are often low and respondents are self-selected, not a representative sample, so read this alongside the clinical measures above, not on its own.
2025 · the views of staff who work at this trust — a measure of workforce culture, morale and confidence, not a direct measure of clinical outcomes. There is no official NHS target for these figures, so they are shown as context, never a pass or fail.
Staff happy for a friend or relative to be treated here
54.6%
Agreed · 2025 NHS Staff Survey▼ 2.2 pts vs 2024Median English trust: 63.9%
Staff engagement
6.46
out of 10 · 2025
Would recommend as a place to work
50.6%
Agreed · 2025
The NHS Staff Survey records the views of staff who chose to respond — a measure of workforce culture, morale and staff confidence, not a direct measure of clinical outcomes or safety. Response rates vary between trusts. England only; Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland run separate staff surveys on a different basis, so these figures are never compared across nations.
Source: NHS Staff Survey (NHS England), Open Government Licence. About this data
Cancelled operations
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · Quarter ending 30 June 2026 · last-minute cancellations for NON-CLINICAL reasons (no bed, no staff, an emergency taking priority) — not cancellations chosen by the patient or on clinical grounds. It's a raw count, so larger trusts naturally cancel more in absolute terms — read this alongside the other measures above, not on its own.
Last-minute cancellations
366
elective ops cancelled on the day, non-clinical reasons
Not rebooked within 28 days
27
the NHS standard is a new date within 28 days
% not rebooked in time
7.4%
share of cancelled ops without a new date inside 28 days
Bed occupancy, ambulance handovers & delayed discharges (UEC Daily SitRep)
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · Snapshot at 8am, 29 March 2026. This is unvalidated management information — NHS England's own label — and can be revised for up to 14 days after first publication. It is collected only during the winter Daily SitRep window, so this is the latest date the collection has published, not necessarily today. It measures operational pressure (how full the hospital is), NOT care quality — high occupancy is normal for NHS hospitals, especially in winter, and is not a safety or performance score. The ambulance-handover figures below cover winter 2025-26 as a period total (not a snapshot): the time from an ambulance arriving to the patient being handed over to A&E staff. The delayed-discharge figures cover the most recent 7 days of the collection (not a snapshot, and not the whole winter): a patient who "no longer meets the criteria to reside" is medically ready to leave hospital, but how quickly they actually do mostly reflects social-care and community capacity to receive them — NOT the hospital's own clinical quality. A higher handover or delayed-discharge figure means more operational pressure — like the rest of this section, none of it is a measure of care quality, and it carries no colour grading, badge or ranking.
Adult general & acute bed occupancy
97.1%
611 occupied of 629 open
Adult critical care occupancy
82.8%
24 occupied of 29 open
Ambulance handovers over 30 minutes
46.0%
of 13,674 handovers, winter 2025-26
Ambulance handovers over 60 minutes
25.8%
of 13,674 handovers, winter 2025-26
Medically fit but not discharged
31
patients/day who no longer met the criteria to reside but stayed in hospital, week to 29 March 2026
Discharged when fit
69%
of 708 who no longer met the criteria to reside, week to 29 March 2026
Source: NHS England UEC Daily SitRep, Ambulance Handover and Acute Discharge SitRep collections. About this data
Never Events (patient safety)
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · Financial year 2025/26 · Never Events are rare, serious, wholly-preventable incidents. This is a RAW count for 2025/26 — it is NOT adjusted for how much surgery the trust does, and NHS England publishes it to prompt learning, NOT to compare trusts. A higher number is a prompt to look at the trust's own review, not proof it is less safe than a trust with fewer.
Never Events reported
2
Occurring in FY 2025/26 · not a comparative safety score
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · CQC National Maternity Survey, 2025 · scores are relative comparisons against other trusts, not a measure of absolute quality — based on 98 voluntary respondents (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). A lower score is a prompt to look closer, not proof of poor care.
Response rate
33.1%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
98
Of 300 sampled
Confidence & trust in staff (antenatal care)
8.0/10
About the same as most trusts
Kindness & compassion (labour & birth)
9.0/10
About the same as most trusts
Involved in decisions about care (labour & birth)
8.2/10
About the same as most trusts
Got help from staff when needed (in hospital, after the birth)
7.1/10
About the same as most trusts
Confidence & trust in your midwife (postnatal care at home)
8.2/10
About the same as most trusts
Midwife listened to you (postnatal care at home)
8.3/10
About the same as most trusts
Source: Care Quality Commission — National Maternity Survey. About this data
Stroke care (SSNAP audit)
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, latest quarter to 2026 · the SSNAP level (A best .. E) is the audit's own published grade for the quality of this team's acute stroke-care PROCESSES, adjusted for case-mix, case ascertainment and audit compliance — it is not a guarantee of any individual patient's outcome. England only; SSNAP also covers Wales and Northern Ireland.
Russells Hall Hospital
E37.5/100
North Midlands
Domain grades (patient-centred)
Hyperacute assessmentD
Specialist pathwayE
ReperfusionE
MDT assessmentB
Therapy intensityC
Therapy frequencyE
Standards by dischargeC
Case ascertainment AAudit compliance A
Source: Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (Royal College of Physicians). About this data
Patient experience — inpatient care
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · CQC Adult Inpatient Survey, 2024 · scores are 0-10, and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the CQC 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 475 voluntary respondents (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.
Response rate
40.5%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
475
Of 1,250 sampled
Quality of information while waiting to be admitted
7.7/10
National average: 7.6/10
About the same as the national average
Cleanliness of your room or ward
9.0/10
National average: 8.9/10
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the doctors
8.8/10
National average: 9.0/10
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the nurses
9.0/10
National average: 8.9/10
About the same as the national average
Enough nurses on duty
7.4/10
National average: 7.6/10
About the same as the national average
Involved in decisions about your care and treatment
6.8/10
National average: 7.2/10
About the same as the national average
Given enough privacy when examined or treated
9.5/10
National average: 9.4/10
About the same as the national average
Given enough notice about when you would leave hospital
6.7/10
National average: 6.9/10
About the same as the national average
Knew what would happen next with your care, before leaving hospital
6.7/10
National average: 6.7/10
About the same as the national average
Source: Care Quality Commission — CQC Adult Inpatient Survey. About this data
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · CQC Urgent & Emergency Care Survey (A&E), 2024 · scores are 0-10, and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the CQC 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 337 voluntary respondents who attended a major (type 1) A&E department (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.
Response rate
27.9%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
337
Of 1,250 sampled
Overall experience of A&E
7.0/10
National average: 7.3/10
About the same as the national average
Told how long you'd wait to be examined
1.9/10
National average: 2.6/10
About the same as the national average
Kept updated on your waiting time
3.3/10
National average: 3.4/10
About the same as the national average
Doctors and nurses listened to you
7.9/10
National average: 8.3/10
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the doctors and nurses
7.9/10
National average: 8.1/10
About the same as the national average
Involved in decisions about your care
7.2/10
National average: 7.4/10
About the same as the national average
Test results explained before you left
6.9/10
National average: 7.5/10
About the same as the national average
Felt safe around other patients
7.7/10
National average: 7.8/10
About the same as the national average
Told how to care for your condition at home after leaving
6.7/10
National average: 6.8/10
About the same as the national average
Treated with respect and dignity
8.0/10
National average: 8.3/10
About the same as the national average
Source: Care Quality Commission — CQC Urgent & Emergency Care Survey (A&E). About this data
Patient experience — cancer care
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · National Cancer Patient Experience Survey, 2025 · scores are the % of patients giving the most positive answer (and an overall 0–10 rating), and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the survey's 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 351 patients treated for cancer by this trust (a question is only shown here where at least 10 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.
Response rate
—
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
351
Who took part
Overall rating of care
8.8/10
National average: 8.9/10
About the same as the national average
Cancer diagnosis explained understandably
81%
National average: 78%
About the same as the national average
Easy to contact your main contact person
85%
National average: 84%
About the same as the national average
Involved as much as wanted in treatment decisions
81%
National average: 80%
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the team during hospital care
77%
National average: 78%
About the same as the national average
Always treated with respect and dignity in hospital
91%
National average: 88%
About the same as the national average
Possible side effects explained understandably
77%
National average: 74%
About the same as the national average
Given enough information about signs of cancer returning or spreading
67%
National average: 65%
About the same as the national average
The whole care team worked well together
88%
National average: 89%
About the same as the national average
Got the support needed from your GP practice since diagnosis
39%
National average: 45%
About the same as the national average
Source: NHS England (survey run by Picker on its behalf) — National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. About this data
Hip & knee replacement — patient outcomes (PROMs)
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · Financial year 2024-25(finalised) · patients having a primary hip or knee replacement voluntarily score their health before and after surgery. The average gain shown is adjusted for differences between patients (case-mix) — it is not a raw before/after difference and not a ranking, so read it alongside the patient numbers.
Hip replacement
Average health gain (adjusted)
20.7
Oxford Score, case-mix-adjusted, 0-48 scale Raw gain (unadjusted): 21.5
Patients
138
Modelled records — completed the questionnaire before & after
% who improved
96.4%
Oxford Score higher after surgery than before
EQ-5D Index gain (adjusted)
0.40
General health, secondary measure, 0-1 scale
Knee replacement
Average health gain (adjusted)
18.0
Oxford Score, case-mix-adjusted, 0-48 scale Raw gain (unadjusted): 17.9
Patients
168
Modelled records — completed the questionnaire before & after
% who improved
97.0%
Oxford Score higher after surgery than before
EQ-5D Index gain (adjusted)
0.34
General health, secondary measure, 0-1 scale
Source: NHS England PROMs (hip & knee replacement). About this data
Diagnostic test waits
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · Latest month: August 2026. The operational standard is that under 1% should wait more than 6 weeks.
Waiting 6+ weeks for a test
19.7%
of 10,976 patients on the diagnostic waiting list
Test
Waiting list
6+ weeks
6+ weeks (count)
13+ weeks
DEXA Scan
780
35.9%
280
0
Ultrasound
3,954
34.9%
1,378
0
Cardiology
1,265
23.0%
291
27
Flexi Sigmoidoscopy
240
17.1%
41
0
Audiology
286
11.5%
33
0
MRI
2,066
4.0%
82
4
Respiratory physiology
492
2.4%
12
1
CT scan
1,185
2.4%
28
0
Gastroscopy
329
2.1%
7
2
Colonoscopy
367
1.4%
5
1
Waiting 6+ weeks for a diagnostic test
All tests combined
Source: NHS England Diagnostic Waiting Times & Activity (DM01). About this data
Safety: infections
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · Cases in the 12 months to August 2026. Hospital-onset cases are those most likely acquired in hospital.
Infection
Cases (12 mo)
Hospital-onset
MRSA bacteraemia
2
1
C. difficile
112
45
E. coli bacteraemia
221
41
MSSA bacteraemia
86
14
Klebsiella bacteraemia
68
16
Pseudomonas bacteraemia
33
12
Hospital-onset cases per month
All infections combined
Source: UK Health Security Agency mandatory surveillance. About this data
Mortality (SHMI)
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · 12 months to May 2026.
As expected
1.01
SHMI value (1.00 = as many deaths as expected) · 2,370 deaths vs 2,345 expected
SHMI over time
Rolling 12-month value
The SHMI compares the number of deaths after hospital care with the number expected given patients' characteristics. It is not a death rate and a higher value is a prompt to investigate, not proof of poor care. Source: NHS England. About this data
Waiting times by specialty
Trust-wide (The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust) · Data: August 2026 · Source: NHS England Referral to Treatment statistics
Corbett Hospital is run by The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust.
How long are waiting times at Corbett Hospital?
NHS England publishes waiting times per trust, not per hospital. Across The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, which runs Corbett Hospital, 63.0% of the waiting list had been waiting 18 weeks or less in August 2026; the NHS standard is 92%.
Every figure on this page comes from an official publication: NHS England Referral to Treatment statistics, NHS England A&E statistics, and the Care Quality Commission directory. Data periods are shown against each figure — NHS England publishes with a lag of around six weeks. Read the full methodology.