48.6% treated within 62 days · standard 85% · About this data
Diagnostics
Below NHS standard
37.3% waiting 6+ weeks · standard 1.0% or fewer · About this data
Mortality (SHMI)
As expected
Screening indicator, not a death rate — a prompt to investigate, not proof of poor care · About this data
In plain English
AI-generated
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn, NHS Foundation Trust reported 8,207 A&E attendances in July 2026, with 64.6% seen within four hours. In June 2026, 25,086 patients were on the waiting list, and 62.8% were seen within 18 weeks of referral. Staff survey data from 2025 showed that 34.7% would recommend the trust to friends or family.
Automatically generated from the official figures on this page and checked to restate only those figures. Last generated 16 August 2026. This is a plain-English summary, not medical advice. About these summaries
▲ 5.5 pts vs yr agoBetter than 27% of trustsData: Jun 2026
Typical (median) wait
13.0 wks
National median: 11.7 wks
▼ 2.2 wks vs yr agoBetter than 30% of trustsData: Jun 2026
Patients on the waiting list
25,086
National median: 39,587
▼ 2,179 vs yr agoData: Jun 2026
Waiting over a year
373
National median: 358.5
▼ 220 vs yr agoBetter than 49% of trustsData: Jun 2026
A&E patients seen within 4 hours
64.6%
National median: 74.2%
▲ 6.0 pts vs yr agoBetter than 12% of trustsData: Jul 2026
A&E attendances
8,207
National median: 14,642
▲ 38 vs yr agoData: Jul 2026
12-hour trolley waits
92
National median: 194
▼ 33 vs yr agoBetter than 62% of trustsData: Jul 2026
Performance over time
Official monthly statistics · hover a month for the exact figure
Total waiting list
Incomplete pathways, all specialties
Waiting under 18 weeks
Share of the waiting list
A&E seen within 4 hours
All department types
Monthly data table
Month
Waiting list
Under 18 weeks
A&E within 4 hours
Jul 2026
—
—
64.6%
Jun 2026
25,086
62.8%
61.3%
May 2026
25,600
61.5%
64.2%
Apr 2026
25,153
59.0%
66.6%
Mar 2026
25,029
58.5%
67.3%
Feb 2026
25,345
54.1%
64.5%
Jan 2026
26,144
53.9%
64.0%
Dec 2025
26,281
54.1%
66.2%
Nov 2025
26,307
55.6%
65.0%
Oct 2025
27,123
55.3%
66.8%
Sept 2025
28,052
55.1%
63.2%
Aug 2025
28,493
58.1%
59.2%
Jul 2025
28,041
56.2%
58.6%
Jun 2025
27,265
57.3%
62.0%
May 2025
27,301
58.7%
62.3%
Apr 2025
26,884
58.4%
61.3%
Mar 2025
25,512
57.9%
60.1%
Feb 2025
25,318
58.2%
58.8%
Jan 2025
24,578
56.6%
60.6%
Dec 2024
25,582
56.6%
58.7%
Nov 2024
25,496
57.0%
63.7%
Oct 2024
26,139
56.9%
66.5%
Sept 2024
26,486
56.6%
65.2%
Aug 2024
26,898
57.3%
70.6%
Jul 2024
26,475
57.6%
71.9%
Jun 2024
26,762
58.6%
71.8%
May 2024
26,454
59.4%
73.4%
Apr 2024
26,372
59.4%
71.4%
Mar 2024
25,607
58.6%
70.7%
Feb 2024
25,531
60.7%
61.3%
Jan 2024
25,272
60.3%
55.1%
Dec 2023
24,660
61.0%
61.5%
Nov 2023
24,347
64.3%
59.2%
Oct 2023
24,848
62.7%
63.0%
Sept 2023
24,829
62.9%
61.6%
Aug 2023
24,746
63.3%
63.2%
Jul 2023
24,098
64.0%
67.6%
Jun 2023
22,158
65.4%
65.2%
May 2023
22,165
65.3%
64.3%
Apr 2023
21,879
64.3%
64.9%
Mar 2023
—
—
62.2%
Feb 2023
—
—
59.2%
Jan 2023
—
—
58.2%
Dec 2022
—
—
55.7%
Nov 2022
—
—
59.1%
Oct 2022
—
—
58.1%
Sept 2022
—
—
58.3%
Aug 2022
—
—
59.0%
Jul 2022
—
—
57.3%
Jun 2022
—
—
59.2%
May 2022
—
—
61.8%
Apr 2022
—
—
60.7%
Mar 2022
19,875
62.8%
57.2%
Feb 2022
19,428
62.2%
60.8%
Jan 2022
19,366
60.6%
64.1%
Dec 2021
19,093
61.6%
56.3%
Nov 2021
18,435
63.9%
60.2%
Oct 2021
18,252
63.7%
61.9%
Sept 2021
17,689
63.8%
64.4%
Aug 2021
17,521
64.4%
68.3%
Jul 2021
17,483
66.7%
72.9%
Jun 2021
17,224
67.2%
76.1%
May 2021
16,850
64.7%
77.2%
Apr 2021
16,762
61.0%
81.7%
Mar 2021
—
—
88.9%
Feb 2021
—
—
83.5%
Jan 2021
—
—
72.5%
Dec 2020
—
—
67.1%
Nov 2020
—
—
74.6%
Oct 2020
—
—
76.5%
Sept 2020
—
—
79.3%
Aug 2020
—
—
87.1%
Jul 2020
—
—
84.6%
Jun 2020
—
—
95.3%
May 2020
—
—
94.0%
Apr 2020
—
—
92.7%
Sources: NHS England Referral to Treatment and A&E monthly statistics.
A&E performance
Latest month: July 2026· all A&E department types combined — the official headline basis.
A&E attendances
8,207
All department types · latest month
Seen within 4 hours
64.6%
All department types · NHS standard: 95%
Waited over 12 hours
92
From decision-to-admit ('trolley waits')
Emergency admissions
2,463
All department types · latest month
Major A&E only (Type 1)
Attendances
7,008
Seen within 4 hours
58.5%
The all-types headline above includes minor-injury units and urgent treatment centres (Type 3), which typically report much higher 4-hour performance and lift the combined figure. This narrower figure covers only the main, consultant-led A&E department— Type 1 in NHS England's classification.
Department type
Attendances
Within 4 hours
All types (official headline)
8,207
64.6%
Type 1 — major A&E
7,008
58.5%
Type 3 — minor injury / UTC
1,199
100.0%
Source: NHS England A&E Attendances & Emergency Admissions. About this data
Cancer waiting times
Latest month: June 2026.
Faster diagnosis (28 days)
68.5%
936 of 1,366 treated in time
Target 75% · below target
Treatment within 62 days
48.6%
44 of 91 treated in time
Target 85% · below target
Treatment within 31 days
94.7%
125 of 132 treated in time
Target 96% · below target
Treated within 62 days
Urgent referral to first treatment
Faster diagnosis (28 days)
Referral to diagnosis or ruling-out
Treated within 31 days
Decision to treat to first treatment
Source: NHS England Cancer Waiting Times. The 62-day standard is urgent referral to first treatment; the 28-day faster-diagnosis standard is referral to diagnosis or ruling-out. About this data
Patient experience (Friends & Family Test)
Latest month: June 2026· a voluntary, monthly feedback survey — the figure is the share of respondents who rated their experience 'good' or 'very good'. Response rates are often low and respondents are self-selected, not a representative sample, so read this alongside the clinical measures above, not on its own.
2025 · the views of staff who work at this trust — a measure of workforce culture, morale and confidence, not a direct measure of clinical outcomes. There is no official NHS target for these figures, so they are shown as context, never a pass or fail.
Staff happy for a friend or relative to be treated here
34.7%
Agreed · 2025 NHS Staff Survey▼ 5.0 pts vs 2024Median English trust: 63.9%
Staff engagement
6.17
out of 10 · 2025
Would recommend as a place to work
35.3%
Agreed · 2025
The NHS Staff Survey records the views of staff who chose to respond — a measure of workforce culture, morale and staff confidence, not a direct measure of clinical outcomes or safety. Response rates vary between trusts. England only; Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland run separate staff surveys on a different basis, so these figures are never compared across nations.
Source: NHS Staff Survey (NHS England), Open Government Licence. About this data
Cancelled operations
Quarter ending 30 June 2026· last-minute cancellations for NON-CLINICAL reasons (no bed, no staff, an emergency taking priority) — not cancellations chosen by the patient or on clinical grounds. It's a raw count, so larger trusts naturally cancel more in absolute terms — read this alongside the other measures above, not on its own.
Last-minute cancellations
142
elective ops cancelled on the day, non-clinical reasons
Not rebooked within 28 days
33
the NHS standard is a new date within 28 days
% not rebooked in time
23.2%
share of cancelled ops without a new date inside 28 days
Bed occupancy, ambulance handovers & delayed discharges (UEC Daily SitRep)
Snapshot at 8am, 29 March 2026. This is unvalidated management information— NHS England's own label — and can be revised for up to 14 days after first publication. It is collected only during the winter Daily SitRep window, so this is the latest date the collection has published, not necessarily today. It measures operational pressure (how full the hospital is), NOT care quality — high occupancy is normal for NHS hospitals, especially in winter, and is not a safety or performance score. The ambulance-handover figures below cover winter 2025-26 as a period total(not a snapshot): the time from an ambulance arriving to the patient being handed over to A&E staff. The delayed-discharge figures cover the most recent 7 daysof the collection (not a snapshot, and not the whole winter): a patient who "no longer meets the criteria to reside" is medically ready to leave hospital, but how quickly they actually do mostly reflects social-care and community capacity to receive them — NOT the hospital's own clinical quality. A higher handover or delayed-discharge figure means more operational pressure — like the rest of this section, none of it is a measure of care quality, and it carries no colour grading, badge or ranking.
Adult general & acute bed occupancy
94.7%
451 occupied of 476 open
Adult critical care occupancy
61.5%
8 occupied of 13 open
Ambulance handovers over 30 minutes
45.8%
of 7,546 handovers, winter 2025-26
Ambulance handovers over 60 minutes
27.0%
of 7,546 handovers, winter 2025-26
Medically fit but not discharged
28
patients/day who no longer met the criteria to reside but stayed in hospital, week to 29 March 2026
Discharged when fit
48%
of 375 who no longer met the criteria to reside, week to 29 March 2026
Source: NHS England UEC Daily SitRep, Ambulance Handover and Acute Discharge SitRep collections. About this data
Never Events (patient safety)
Financial year 2025/26 · Never Events are rare, serious, wholly-preventable incidents. This is a RAW count for 2025/26— it is NOT adjusted for how much surgery the trust does, and NHS England publishes it to prompt learning, NOT to compare trusts. A higher number is a prompt to look at the trust's own review, not proof it is less safe than a trust with fewer.
Never Events reported
1
Occurring in FY 2025/26 · not a comparative safety score
CQC National Maternity Survey, 2025 · scores are relative comparisons against other trusts, not a measure of absolute quality — based on 101 voluntary respondents (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). A lower score is a prompt to look closer, not proof of poor care.
Response rate
44.5%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
101
Of 230 sampled
Confidence & trust in staff (antenatal care)
8.9/10
About the same as most trusts
Kindness & compassion (labour & birth)
9.6/10
Better than most trusts
Involved in decisions about care (labour & birth)
9.4/10
Better than most trusts
Got help from staff when needed (in hospital, after the birth)
7.3/10
About the same as most trusts
Confidence & trust in your midwife (postnatal care at home)
8.9/10
About the same as most trusts
Midwife listened to you (postnatal care at home)
9.5/10
Better than most trusts
Source: Care Quality Commission — National Maternity Survey. About this data
Stroke care (SSNAP audit)
Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, latest quarter to 2026· the SSNAP level (A best .. E) is the audit's own published grade for the quality of this team's acute stroke-care PROCESSES, adjusted for case-mix, case ascertainment and audit compliance — it is not a guarantee of any individual patient's outcome. England only; SSNAP also covers Wales and Northern Ireland.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Kings Lynn
E28.1/100
East of England (North)
Domain grades (patient-centred)
Hyperacute assessmentC
Specialist pathwayE
ReperfusionE
MDT assessmentD
Therapy intensityD
Therapy frequencyE
Standards by dischargeE
Case ascertainment AAudit compliance C
Source: Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (Royal College of Physicians). About this data
Hip fracture care (NHFD audit)
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn, NHS Foundation Trust · National Hip Fracture Database, 2023audit year · "Met best-practice criteria" is the audit's own composite measure of hip-fracture care PROCESSES at each hospital this trust runs.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital (King's Lynn)Best-practice 44.5%469 cases
Source: National Hip Fracture Database (Royal College of Physicians). About this data
Patient experience — inpatient care
CQC Adult Inpatient Survey, 2024 · scores are 0-10, and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the CQC 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 479 voluntary respondents (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.
Response rate
42.7%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
479
Of 1,250 sampled
Quality of information while waiting to be admitted
7.6/10
National average: 7.6/10
About the same as the national average
Cleanliness of your room or ward
9.1/10
National average: 8.9/10
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the doctors
8.6/10
National average: 9.0/10
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the nurses
8.7/10
National average: 8.9/10
About the same as the national average
Enough nurses on duty
6.7/10
National average: 7.6/10
Worse than the national average
Involved in decisions about your care and treatment
6.9/10
National average: 7.2/10
About the same as the national average
Given enough privacy when examined or treated
9.4/10
National average: 9.4/10
About the same as the national average
Given enough notice about when you would leave hospital
6.5/10
National average: 6.9/10
About the same as the national average
Knew what would happen next with your care, before leaving hospital
6.3/10
National average: 6.7/10
About the same as the national average
Source: Care Quality Commission — CQC Adult Inpatient Survey. About this data
CQC Urgent & Emergency Care Survey (A&E), 2024 · scores are 0-10, and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the CQC 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 543 voluntary respondents who attended a major (type 1) A&E department (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.
Response rate
45.2%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
543
Of 1,250 sampled
Overall experience of A&E
7.8/10
National average: 7.3/10
About the same as the national average
Told how long you'd wait to be examined
2.8/10
National average: 2.6/10
About the same as the national average
Kept updated on your waiting time
4.0/10
National average: 3.4/10
About the same as the national average
Doctors and nurses listened to you
8.2/10
National average: 8.3/10
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the doctors and nurses
8.2/10
National average: 8.1/10
About the same as the national average
Involved in decisions about your care
7.6/10
National average: 7.4/10
About the same as the national average
Test results explained before you left
7.5/10
National average: 7.5/10
About the same as the national average
Felt safe around other patients
8.6/10
National average: 7.8/10
About the same as the national average
Told how to care for your condition at home after leaving
6.7/10
National average: 6.8/10
About the same as the national average
Treated with respect and dignity
8.7/10
National average: 8.3/10
About the same as the national average
Source: Care Quality Commission — CQC Urgent & Emergency Care Survey (A&E). About this data
Patient experience — cancer care
National Cancer Patient Experience Survey, 2025 · scores are the % of patients giving the most positive answer (and an overall 0–10 rating), and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the survey's 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 346 patients treated for cancer by this trust (a question is only shown here where at least 10 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.
Response rate
—
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
346
Who took part
Overall rating of care
8.7/10
National average: 8.9/10
Worse than the national average
Cancer diagnosis explained understandably
77%
National average: 78%
About the same as the national average
Easy to contact your main contact person
86%
National average: 84%
About the same as the national average
Involved as much as wanted in treatment decisions
80%
National average: 80%
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the team during hospital care
67%
National average: 78%
Worse than the national average
Always treated with respect and dignity in hospital
82%
National average: 88%
About the same as the national average
Possible side effects explained understandably
72%
National average: 74%
About the same as the national average
Given enough information about signs of cancer returning or spreading
65%
National average: 65%
About the same as the national average
The whole care team worked well together
88%
National average: 89%
About the same as the national average
Got the support needed from your GP practice since diagnosis
40%
National average: 45%
About the same as the national average
Source: NHS England (survey run by Picker on its behalf) — National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. About this data
Hip & knee replacement — patient outcomes (PROMs)
Financial year 2024-25(finalised) · patients having a primary hip or knee replacement voluntarily score their health before and after surgery. The average gain shown is adjusted for differences between patients (case-mix) — it is not a raw before/after difference and not a ranking, so read it alongside the patient numbers.
Hip replacement
Average health gain (adjusted)
23.7
Oxford Score, case-mix-adjusted, 0-48 scale Raw gain (unadjusted): 24.4
Patients
91
Modelled records — completed the questionnaire before & after
% who improved
100.0%
Oxford Score higher after surgery than before
EQ-5D Index gain (adjusted)
0.50
General health, secondary measure, 0-1 scale
Knee replacement
Average health gain (adjusted)
15.0
Oxford Score, case-mix-adjusted, 0-48 scale Raw gain (unadjusted): 16.3
Patients
78
Modelled records — completed the questionnaire before & after
% who improved
92.3%
Oxford Score higher after surgery than before
EQ-5D Index gain (adjusted)
0.29
General health, secondary measure, 0-1 scale
Source: NHS England PROMs (hip & knee replacement). About this data
Diagnostic test waits
Latest month: June 2026. The operational standard is that under 1% should wait more than 6 weeks.
Waiting 6+ weeks for a test
37.3%
of 8,740 patients on the diagnostic waiting list
Test
Waiting list
6+ weeks
6+ weeks (count)
13+ weeks
Audiology
1,915
92.6%
1,773
1,628
Cardiology
1,233
58.6%
723
293
Ultrasound
2,345
18.0%
423
3
MRI
1,481
16.4%
243
0
Colonoscopy
177
14.7%
26
2
Cystoscopy
50
12.0%
6
4
Gastroscopy
139
5.8%
8
0
CT scan
963
4.8%
46
3
DEXA Scan
142
1.4%
2
0
Neurophysiology
248
0.4%
1
0
Waiting 6+ weeks for a diagnostic test
All tests combined
Source: NHS England Diagnostic Waiting Times & Activity (DM01). About this data
Safety: infections
Cases in the 12 months to July 2026. Hospital-onset cases are those most likely acquired in hospital.
Infection
Cases (12 mo)
Hospital-onset
MRSA bacteraemia
2
0
C. difficile
85
31
E. coli bacteraemia
254
31
MSSA bacteraemia
56
10
Klebsiella bacteraemia
86
14
Pseudomonas bacteraemia
29
9
Hospital-onset cases per month
All infections combined
Source: UK Health Security Agency mandatory surveillance. About this data
Mortality (SHMI)
12 months to Mar 2026.
As expected
1.10
SHMI value (1.00 = as many deaths as expected) · 1,585 deaths vs 1,435 expected
SHMI over time
Rolling 12-month value
The SHMI compares the number of deaths after hospital care with the number expected given patients' characteristics. It is not a death rate and a higher value is a prompt to investigate, not proof of poor care. Source: NHS England. About this data
Waiting times by specialty
Data: June 2026 · Source: NHS England Referral to Treatment statistics (incomplete pathways)
Figures come from NHS England's official monthly statistics and the CQC directory, reproduced under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See methodology for definitions.