HospitalCheck

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Manchester, M13 9WL · Compare with another trust

At a glance

Whether this trust meets each official NHS operational standard — not a combined score or ranking.

Waiting times
Below NHS standard
63.8% within 18 weeks · standard 92% · About this data
A&E
Below NHS standard
75.8% within 4 hours · standard 95% · About this data
Cancer
Below NHS standard
68.4% treated within 62 days · standard 85% · About this data
Diagnostics
Below NHS standard
9.0% waiting 6+ weeks · standard 1.0% or fewer · About this data
Mortality (SHMI)
As expected
Screening indicator, not a death rate — a prompt to investigate, not proof of poor care · About this data

In plain English

AI-generated

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust reported 43,289 A&E attendances in July 2026, with 75.8% of patients treated within four hours. In June 2026, the trust had 166,009 patients on its waiting list, and 63.8% were seen within 18 weeks of referral. Staff survey data from 2025 showed that 65.4% of employees would recommend the trust to friends or relatives.

Automatically generated from the official figures on this page and checked to restate only those figures. Last generated 16 August 2026. This is a plain-English summary, not medical advice. About these summaries

Hospitals run by this trust

Trust performance

Treated or seen within 18 weeks
63.8%
National median: 66.3%
10.6 pts vs yr agoBetter than 31% of trustsData: Jun 2026
Typical (median) wait
13.1 wks
National median: 11.7 wks
3.5 wks vs yr agoBetter than 28% of trustsData: Jun 2026
Patients on the waiting list
166,009
National median: 39,587
20,856 vs yr agoData: Jun 2026
Waiting over a year
1,430
National median: 358.5
6,070 vs yr agoBetter than 12% of trustsData: Jun 2026
A&E patients seen within 4 hours
75.8%
National median: 74.2%
1.4 pts vs yr agoBetter than 59% of trustsData: Jul 2026
A&E attendances
43,289
National median: 14,642
2,341 vs yr agoData: Jul 2026
12-hour trolley waits
86
National median: 194
15 vs yr agoBetter than 65% of trustsData: Jul 2026

A&E performance

Latest month: July 2026· all A&E department types combined — the official headline basis.

A&E attendances
43,289
All department types · latest month
Seen within 4 hours
75.8%
All department types · NHS standard: 95%
Waited over 12 hours
86
From decision-to-admit ('trolley waits')
Emergency admissions
6,561
All department types · latest month
Major A&E only (Type 1)
Attendances
27,614
Seen within 4 hours
63.5%

The all-types headline above includes minor-injury units and urgent treatment centres (Type 3), which typically report much higher 4-hour performance and lift the combined figure. This narrower figure covers only the main, consultant-led A&E department— Type 1 in NHS England's classification.

Department typeAttendancesWithin 4 hours
All types (official headline)43,28975.8%
Type 1 — major A&E27,61463.5%
Type 2 — single-specialty A&E3,55695.2%
Type 3 — minor injury / UTC12,11998.0%

Source: NHS England A&E Attendances & Emergency Admissions. About this data

Cancer waiting times

Latest month: June 2026.

Faster diagnosis (28 days)
80.0%
4,535 of 5,666 treated in time
Target 75% · meets target
Treatment within 62 days
68.4%
358 of 524 treated in time
Target 85% · below target
Treatment within 31 days
92.9%
614 of 661 treated in time
Target 96% · below target
Treated within 62 days
Urgent referral to first treatment
60%70%80%Apr 25Jan 26NHS standard 85%68.4%64.9%April 202565.5%May 202561.4%June 202561.4%July 202563.1%August 202562.7%September 202564.2%October 202566.2%November 202573.3%December 202570.1%January 202674.0%February 202676.3%March 202675.5%April 202673.5%May 202668.4%June 2026
Faster diagnosis (28 days)
Referral to diagnosis or ruling-out
75%80%85%Apr 25Jan 26NHS standard 75%80.0%76.3%April 202575.2%May 202578.4%June 202575.3%July 202573.3%August 202572.1%September 202578.1%October 202580.8%November 202580.3%December 202578.7%January 202684.5%February 202683.4%March 202679.1%April 202683.0%May 202680.0%June 2026
Treated within 31 days
Decision to treat to first treatment
90%95%Apr 25Jan 26NHS standard 96%92.9%88.1%April 202588.0%May 202590.2%June 202589.9%July 202589.8%August 202588.3%September 202589.3%October 202590.5%November 202590.6%December 202586.4%January 202689.9%February 202691.0%March 202690.3%April 202691.9%May 202692.9%June 2026

Source: NHS England Cancer Waiting Times. The 62-day standard is urgent referral to first treatment; the 28-day faster-diagnosis standard is referral to diagnosis or ruling-out. About this data

Patient experience (Friends & Family Test)

Latest month: June 2026· a voluntary, monthly feedback survey — the figure is the share of respondents who rated their experience 'good' or 'very good'. Response rates are often low and respondents are self-selected, not a representative sample, so read this alongside the clinical measures above, not on its own.

Inpatient care
% would recommend
97.0%
Rated care 'good' or 'very good'
% would not recommend
0.9%
Rated care 'poor' or 'very poor'
Responses
7,762
Number of patients who gave feedback
Response rate
36.8%
Responses as a share of those eligible
Urgent & emergency care (A&E)
% would recommend
85.5%
Rated care 'good' or 'very good'
% would not recommend
9.7%
Rated care 'poor' or 'very poor'
Responses
2,238
Number of patients who gave feedback
Response rate
4.5%
Responses as a share of those eligible

Source: NHS England Friends & Family Test. About this data

Staff experience (NHS Staff Survey)

2025 · the views of staff who work at this trust — a measure of workforce culture, morale and confidence, not a direct measure of clinical outcomes. There is no official NHS target for these figures, so they are shown as context, never a pass or fail.

Staff happy for a friend or relative to be treated here
65.4%
Agreed · 2025 NHS Staff Survey▼ 0.2 pts vs 2024Median English trust: 63.9%
Staff engagement
6.73
out of 10 · 2025
Would recommend as a place to work
57.8%
Agreed · 2025

The NHS Staff Survey records the views of staff who chose to respond — a measure of workforce culture, morale and staff confidence, not a direct measure of clinical outcomes or safety. Response rates vary between trusts. England only; Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland run separate staff surveys on a different basis, so these figures are never compared across nations.

Source: NHS Staff Survey (NHS England), Open Government Licence. About this data

Cancelled operations

Quarter ending 30 June 2026· last-minute cancellations for NON-CLINICAL reasons (no bed, no staff, an emergency taking priority) — not cancellations chosen by the patient or on clinical grounds. It's a raw count, so larger trusts naturally cancel more in absolute terms — read this alongside the other measures above, not on its own.

Last-minute cancellations
619
elective ops cancelled on the day, non-clinical reasons
Not rebooked within 28 days
123
the NHS standard is a new date within 28 days
% not rebooked in time
19.9%
share of cancelled ops without a new date inside 28 days

Source: NHS England (QMCO). About this data

Bed occupancy, ambulance handovers & delayed discharges (UEC Daily SitRep)

Snapshot at 8am, 29 March 2026. This is unvalidated management information— NHS England's own label — and can be revised for up to 14 days after first publication. It is collected only during the winter Daily SitRep window, so this is the latest date the collection has published, not necessarily today. It measures operational pressure (how full the hospital is), NOT care quality — high occupancy is normal for NHS hospitals, especially in winter, and is not a safety or performance score. The ambulance-handover figures below cover winter 2025-26 as a period total(not a snapshot): the time from an ambulance arriving to the patient being handed over to A&E staff. The delayed-discharge figures cover the most recent 7 daysof the collection (not a snapshot, and not the whole winter): a patient who "no longer meets the criteria to reside" is medically ready to leave hospital, but how quickly they actually do mostly reflects social-care and community capacity to receive them — NOT the hospital's own clinical quality. A higher handover or delayed-discharge figure means more operational pressure — like the rest of this section, none of it is a measure of care quality, and it carries no colour grading, badge or ranking.

Adult general & acute bed occupancy
92.8%
1,713 occupied of 1,846 open
Adult critical care occupancy
70.1%
89 occupied of 127 open
Ambulance handovers over 30 minutes
9.6%
of 28,042 handovers, winter 2025-26
Ambulance handovers over 60 minutes
0.8%
of 28,042 handovers, winter 2025-26
Medically fit but not discharged
273
patients/day who no longer met the criteria to reside but stayed in hospital, week to 29 March 2026
Discharged when fit
48%
of 3,663 who no longer met the criteria to reside, week to 29 March 2026

Source: NHS England UEC Daily SitRep, Ambulance Handover and Acute Discharge SitRep collections. About this data

Never Events (patient safety)

Financial year 2025/26 · Never Events are rare, serious, wholly-preventable incidents. This is a RAW count for 2025/26— it is NOT adjusted for how much surgery the trust does, and NHS England publishes it to prompt learning, NOT to compare trusts. A higher number is a prompt to look at the trust's own review, not proof it is less safe than a trust with fewer.

Never Events reported
12
Occurring in FY 2025/26 · not a comparative safety score

Source: NHS England. About this data

Maternity — patient experience

CQC National Maternity Survey, 2025 · scores are relative comparisons against other trusts, not a measure of absolute quality — based on 390 voluntary respondents (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). A lower score is a prompt to look closer, not proof of poor care.

Response rate
34.0%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
390
Of 1,159 sampled
Confidence & trust in staff (antenatal care)
8.4/10
About the same as most trusts
Kindness & compassion (labour & birth)
8.8/10
About the same as most trusts
Involved in decisions about care (labour & birth)
8.5/10
About the same as most trusts
Got help from staff when needed (in hospital, after the birth)
7.4/10
About the same as most trusts
Confidence & trust in your midwife (postnatal care at home)
8.2/10
About the same as most trusts
Midwife listened to you (postnatal care at home)
8.7/10
About the same as most trusts

Source: Care Quality Commission — National Maternity Survey. About this data

Stroke care (SSNAP audit)

Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, latest quarter to 2026· the SSNAP level (A best .. E) is the audit's own published grade for the quality of this team's acute stroke-care PROCESSES, adjusted for case-mix, case ascertainment and audit compliance — it is not a guarantee of any individual patient's outcome. England only; SSNAP also covers Wales and Northern Ireland.

Manchester Royal Infirmary
D43.6/100
Greater Manchester
Domain grades (patient-centred)
Hyperacute assessmentC
Specialist pathwayD
ReperfusionE
MDT assessmentC
Therapy intensityD
Therapy frequencyE
Standards by dischargeC
Case ascertainment AAudit compliance D

This team's case ascertainment and/or audit compliance band is D or E — its SSNAP grade above rests on less-complete data than a team with a higher band, not necessarily worse care.

Trafford General Hospital
B70.2/100
Greater Manchester
Domain grades (patient-centred)
Hyperacute assessmentB
Specialist pathwayA
ReperfusionD
MDT assessmentA
Therapy intensityC
Therapy frequencyE
Standards by dischargeB
Case ascertainment AAudit compliance A

Source: Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (Royal College of Physicians). About this data

Hip fracture care (NHFD audit)

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust · National Hip Fracture Database, 2023audit year · "Met best-practice criteria" is the audit's own composite measure of hip-fracture care PROCESSES at each hospital this trust runs.

Manchester Royal InfirmaryBest-practice 25.0%38 cases
North Manchester General HospitalBest-practice 27.6%375 cases
Wythenshawe HospitalBest-practice 77.9%546 cases

Source: National Hip Fracture Database (Royal College of Physicians). About this data

Patient experience — inpatient care

CQC Adult Inpatient Survey, 2024 · scores are 0-10, and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the CQC 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 439 voluntary respondents (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.

Response rate
37.6%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
439
Of 1,250 sampled
Quality of information while waiting to be admitted
8.0/10
National average: 7.6/10
About the same as the national average
Cleanliness of your room or ward
8.7/10
National average: 8.9/10
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the doctors
9.4/10
National average: 9.0/10
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the nurses
8.8/10
National average: 8.9/10
About the same as the national average
Enough nurses on duty
7.3/10
National average: 7.6/10
About the same as the national average
Involved in decisions about your care and treatment
7.3/10
National average: 7.2/10
About the same as the national average
Given enough privacy when examined or treated
9.5/10
National average: 9.4/10
About the same as the national average
Given enough notice about when you would leave hospital
7.1/10
National average: 6.9/10
About the same as the national average
Knew what would happen next with your care, before leaving hospital
6.8/10
National average: 6.7/10
About the same as the national average

Source: Care Quality CommissionCQC Adult Inpatient Survey. About this data

Patient experience — A&E (urgent & emergency care)

CQC Urgent & Emergency Care Survey (A&E), 2024 · scores are 0-10, and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the CQC 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 216 voluntary respondents who attended a major (type 1) A&E department (a question is only shown here where at least 30 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.

Response rate
23.7%
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
216
Of 950 sampled
Overall experience of A&E
7.1/10
National average: 7.3/10
About the same as the national average
Told how long you'd wait to be examined
3.0/10
National average: 2.6/10
About the same as the national average
Kept updated on your waiting time
4.3/10
National average: 3.4/10
About the same as the national average
Doctors and nurses listened to you
8.5/10
National average: 8.3/10
About the same as the national average
Confidence and trust in the doctors and nurses
7.9/10
National average: 8.1/10
About the same as the national average
Involved in decisions about your care
8.0/10
National average: 7.4/10
About the same as the national average
Test results explained before you left
6.9/10
National average: 7.5/10
About the same as the national average
Felt safe around other patients
7.5/10
National average: 7.8/10
About the same as the national average
Told how to care for your condition at home after leaving
7.0/10
National average: 6.8/10
About the same as the national average
Treated with respect and dignity
8.3/10
National average: 8.3/10
About the same as the national average

Source: Care Quality CommissionCQC Urgent & Emergency Care Survey (A&E). About this data

Patient experience — cancer care

National Cancer Patient Experience Survey, 2025 · scores are the % of patients giving the most positive answer (and an overall 0–10 rating), and "better"/"worse" means the trust's score falls outside the range expected for a trust of its size (the survey's 95% expected range, centred on the national average) — a statistical-significance test, not a raw ranking. Based on 735 patients treated for cancer by this trust (a question is only shown here where at least 10 people at this trust answered it). England only; response rates vary between trusts.

Response rate
Share of those sampled who responded
Respondents
735
Who took part
Overall rating of care
9.1/10
National average: 8.9/10
About the same as the national average
Cancer diagnosis explained understandably
84%
National average: 78%
Better than the national average
Easy to contact your main contact person
85%
National average: 84%
About the same as the national average
Involved as much as wanted in treatment decisions
84%
National average: 80%
Better than the national average
Confidence and trust in the team during hospital care
83%
National average: 78%
Better than the national average
Always treated with respect and dignity in hospital
90%
National average: 88%
About the same as the national average
Possible side effects explained understandably
77%
National average: 74%
About the same as the national average
Given enough information about signs of cancer returning or spreading
70%
National average: 65%
Better than the national average
The whole care team worked well together
91%
National average: 89%
About the same as the national average
Got the support needed from your GP practice since diagnosis
48%
National average: 45%
About the same as the national average

Source: NHS England (survey run by Picker on its behalf)National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. About this data

Hip & knee replacement — patient outcomes (PROMs)

Financial year 2024-25(finalised) · patients having a primary hip or knee replacement voluntarily score their health before and after surgery. The average gain shown is adjusted for differences between patients (case-mix) — it is not a raw before/after difference and not a ranking, so read it alongside the patient numbers.

Hip replacement
Average health gain (adjusted)
23.1
Oxford Score, case-mix-adjusted, 0-48 scale
Raw gain (unadjusted): 22.5
Patients
36
Modelled records — completed the questionnaire before & after
% who improved
94.4%
Oxford Score higher after surgery than before
EQ-5D Index gain (adjusted)
0.42
General health, secondary measure, 0-1 scale
Knee replacement
Average health gain (adjusted)
16.5
Oxford Score, case-mix-adjusted, 0-48 scale
Raw gain (unadjusted): 16.5
Patients
47
Modelled records — completed the questionnaire before & after
% who improved
89.4%
Oxford Score higher after surgery than before
EQ-5D Index gain (adjusted)
0.33
General health, secondary measure, 0-1 scale

Source: NHS England PROMs (hip & knee replacement). About this data

Diagnostic test waits

Latest month: June 2026. The operational standard is that under 1% should wait more than 6 weeks.

Waiting 6+ weeks for a test
9.0%
of 31,937 patients on the diagnostic waiting list
TestWaiting list6+ weeks6+ weeks (count)13+ weeks
Urodynamics21940.6%8916
Gastroscopy1,29528.4%368245
Respiratory physiology1,70525.6%43754
Cystoscopy71318.9%13556
MRI6,98013.4%938266
CT scan4,51213.0%58666
Colonoscopy8745.4%4729
Cardiology3,1053.6%11129
Audiology1,2952.8%360
Ultrasound9,3481.3%12233
Flexi Sigmoidoscopy2190.9%21
Barium Enema2060.0%00
DEXA Scan9000.0%00
Neurophysiology5560.0%00
Waiting 6+ weeks for a diagnostic test
All tests combined
7.5%10%12.5%Apr 25Jan 269.0%13.2%April 202514.2%May 202513.3%June 202512.7%July 202513.9%August 202513.0%September 202511.7%October 202511.9%November 202513.5%December 202512.4%January 20268.2%February 20267.4%March 20268.7%April 20268.6%May 20269.0%June 2026

Source: NHS England Diagnostic Waiting Times & Activity (DM01). About this data

Safety: infections

Cases in the 12 months to July 2026. Hospital-onset cases are those most likely acquired in hospital.

InfectionCases (12 mo)Hospital-onset
MRSA bacteraemia269
C. difficile280164
E. coli bacteraemia852175
MSSA bacteraemia284103
Klebsiella bacteraemia279106
Pseudomonas bacteraemia7739
Hospital-onset cases per month
All infections combined
4060Dec 23Jan 25Jan 265563December 202356January 202449February 202459March 202458April 202465May 202445June 202471July 202474August 202462September 202460October 202459November 202458December 202468January 202532February 202555March 202551April 202561May 202551June 202552July 202567August 202541September 202552October 202541November 202557December 202547January 202644February 202656March 202647April 202652May 202637June 202655July 2026

Source: UK Health Security Agency mandatory surveillance. About this data

Mortality (SHMI)

12 months to Mar 2026.

As expected
1.00
SHMI value (1.00 = as many deaths as expected) · 4,140 deaths vs 4,120 expected
SHMI over time
Rolling 12-month value
0.901.001.10Dec 18Jan 20Jan 21Jan 22Jan 23Jan 24Jan 25Jan 26As expected (1.00)1.000.94December 20180.95January 20190.95February 20190.94March 20190.94April 20190.94May 20190.93June 20190.94July 20190.94August 20190.92September 20190.92October 20190.95November 20190.95December 20190.96January 20200.96February 20200.97March 20200.97April 20200.96May 20200.96June 20200.96July 20200.95August 20200.95September 20200.96October 20200.95November 20200.94December 20200.93January 20210.91February 20210.91March 20210.92April 20210.92May 20210.93June 20210.93July 20210.94August 20210.94September 20210.94October 20210.95November 20210.95December 20210.95January 20220.96February 20220.96March 20220.95April 20220.95May 20220.94June 20220.94July 20220.94August 20220.95September 20220.98October 20221.00November 20221.02December 20221.04January 20231.05February 20231.07March 20231.08April 20231.08May 20231.09June 20231.10July 20231.10August 20231.09September 20231.07October 20231.06November 20231.04December 20231.03January 20241.04February 20241.03March 20241.04April 20241.06May 20241.06June 20241.07July 20241.08August 20241.06September 20241.06October 20241.06November 20241.05December 20241.06January 20251.04February 20251.04March 20251.04April 20251.02May 20251.03June 20251.02July 20251.03August 20251.01September 20251.00October 20251.00November 20250.99December 20251.00January 20261.00February 20261.00March 2026

The SHMI compares the number of deaths after hospital care with the number expected given patients' characteristics. It is not a death rate and a higher value is a prompt to investigate, not proof of poor care. Source: NHS England. About this data

Waiting times by specialty

Data: June 2026 · Source: NHS England Referral to Treatment statistics (incomplete pathways)

SpecialtyWaitingWithin 18 wksMedian wait9 in 10 wait under52+ wks65+ wks78+ wks
Other - Medicals23,59372.1%10.4 wks32.5 wks2000
Gynaecology18,49855.8%15.9 wks40.1 wks13700
Other - Paediatrics18,23157.9%15.0 wks39.9 wks3300
Oral Surgery15,69253.7%16.7 wks43.0 wks43400
Other - Surgicals12,92674.9%9.8 wks31.7 wks2300
Trauma and Orthopaedic12,26257.3%15.2 wks42.6 wks32800
Ophthalmology11,38469.2%11.0 wks35.5 wks4400
Ear Nose and Throat8,87158.8%14.5 wks39.3 wks9300
Cardiology8,38161.5%13.8 wks38.8 wks2800
Gastroenterology7,65874.7%10.4 wks29.6 wks1500
Urology6,45555.6%15.6 wks41.8 wks12000
Plastic Surgery5,23850.4%17.8 wks45.1 wks11600
General Surgery5,19659.5%14.5 wks36.4 wks3600
Other - Others4,17680.0%9.0 wks28.4 wks200
Respiratory Medicine3,02093.3%6.5 wks17.4 wks000
Dermatology1,57777.4%7.5 wks27.7 wks000
Rheumatology1,12490.8%6.4 wks18.7 wks000
Cardiothoracic Surgery76285.2%7.7 wks23.8 wks000
Elderly Medicine65560.8%11.9 wks37.1 wks000
General Internal Medicine21287.7%7.6 wks22.0 wks100
Neurology6567.7%13.8 wks34.8 wks000
Other - Mental Healths3397.0%10.2 wks16.7 wks000

Figures come from NHS England's official monthly statistics and the CQC directory, reproduced under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See methodology for definitions.